Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Specifies the store + style combinations that should not be allocated/replenished. Store name can be left blank if a Style needs to be excluded from all the Stores or a channel name can be mentioned against the style to exclude it from all stores belonging to that channel. This list needs to be changed every time there is a change in the season.
This list needs to be given at the parent-style level. If either a parent/child style is present in the exclusion list, the entire family of styles will be part of the exclusion.

...

In case there are multiple styles for a single store in this list, the system decides the priority using its algorithm. This list needs to be given at the parent-style level. If either a parent/child style is present in the inclusion list, the entire family of styles will be part of the inclusion.

Warehouse Planogram:

Warehouse capacity - the total quantity that the warehouse can hold at a given point of time at a category level. The same can be set as target cover days of inventory in the replenishment cycle days column

...

JIT Style Depth Override:

For JIT styles, the over ride override depth in which the mentioned style has to be allocated and replenished where the default JIT depth of 1 is not sufficient

...

Defines the Maximum allowed quantity in Pivotal and Non-pivotal SKUs for every Store+ Category+ Sub Category combinationscombination.

Style Level Merchandise Tagging:

...

Store Category combination priority: The combination of categories that are allowed to be dispatched to a store in a story/theme/collection in case all the categories of the story/collection are not available. The priority defined here does not play any role in the order in which the combinations are dispatched.

Possible Pitfalls:

  1. Getting in-season styles –

  • Desired The desired style is not in the output across all stores for a channel

    • It’s Its season is not given in the season list.

    • Season The season is overridden with some channels, and no store for that channel is present in the distribution store list.

  • Distribution failed with the “No style is live” error 

    • No style belongs to the given season list.

    • Season tagging is overridden for incorrect channels.

2. Getting inventory for in-season styles –

  • End-date stock is not taken correctly

    • End The end date for the run , doesn’t match the date of the end date stock.

    • Style is not in season.

    • Store_inventory_flag is turned off.

  • GIT, Open orders, and IST in transit are not taken correctly

    • End The end date for the run , doesn’t match the date of the corresponding tables.

    • Style is not in season.

    • Git_inventory_flag is off.

  • Warehouse stock is not considered properly

    • End The end date for the run , doesn’t match the date of the corresponding tables.

    • Warehouse mapping is not given for a store category, or the table is empty.

    • Wh_stock_alloc_flag is set to false.

    • Style is not in season.

  • Distribution failed with “No style is live” error  – All the above-mentioned errors can cause this error.

...

  •  A style is not present in the distribution output

    • It was not present in the in-season style  style list.

    • Inventory was not present for the style.

  • Distribution failed with the “No style is live” error 

    • No in-season style was present in the inventory.

Calculating size depths

  • No allocation happened for a store style 

    • Size The size set may not be there for the Store-cat-subcat combination.

  • Incorrect allocation happened for a store style

    • Size The size set may not be there for the Store-cat-subcat combination and suggested allocation might be coming only from ROS, so for zero ROS store skusSKUs, alloc_suggested is zero.

...

  • Incorrect warehouse stock in distribution output : 

    • Some inventory got removed due to warehouse inefficiency.

    • Some inventory got reserved due to lead time.

...

  • ROS is zero/incorrect even though sales is are there

    • Sales might have been cleaned up, check cleanup benchmarks

    • Sales might not lie in the ROS period.

    • It is USPL.

Top seller identification

  • A style is incorrectly identified/Not identified as a top seller

    • Check benchmarks for top seller identification.

    • If a style is not identified as a top seller then sales might have been cleaned up.

...

  • A store style is not present in the final distribution output

    • There was no sales present even at the channel category level for the store style.

    • Total The total inventory available in the store and warehouse for the store style is zero.

  • Rev Per Day for a store style is printed wrongly

    • Sales might have been cleaned up for the store style.

    • It is a new store, and the rev per day printed is from the reference store.

    • It is a parent parenting style and revenue and live days are coming from child styles.

...

  • Store Style 1 is below/above Store Style 2  even though Store Style 1 is better/worse than store style 2

    • It can happen for store style resolved at different levels, and store style which was resolved at a lower level can be better ranked because we have to maintain relative ranking for store styles resolved at the same level. For example There , there is a store style SS3 between  SS1 And SS2 such that ranking is SS1 > SS3> SS2, where SS1 was better than SS3 because both were resolved at the same level and SS1 has better rev per day,  and SS3  is better than SS2, so a comparison between SS2 and SS1 never happened.

  • A store style(SS1) with no sales is ranked above than a store style(SS2) which has sales

    • Store 1 might be a new store and rev per day was computed wrt reference Store.